Tag: chris pratt

MOVIE REVIEW Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom (2018)

Fair warning: considerable spoilers follow – read after watching.

Just over a week ago, one of my favourite video essayists, Patrick (H) Willems, posted a video titled “Jurassic Park’s Sequel Problem”, in which he outlines why he thinks there hasn’t yet been a great Jurassic Park sequel – or at least one that lives up to the original 1993 film, and the first in the franchise.

“In the first movie, the characters go to the island not knowing what’s there but being confident that everything is safe and reliable since, y’know, it’s a giant, professionally run theme park,” says Willems. “But then everything goes to hell and we realise what a bad idea it is and everyone gets the fuck out of there.”

“Then, in the sequels, they keep going back,” he continues. “And thus we have a disconnect between the audience and the characters. We know the island is a terrible, dangerous place where everyone dies, and so do the characters, so when they go there anyway, we can’t relate to that decision. This is where the empathy machine breaks down.”

I couldn’t help but think about Willems’ video as I was watching the opening act of Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom – the sequel to the massively successful Jurassic World, released in 2015 – and it dawned on me that the first few minutes were character introductions so that they can go back to the island again.

And go back they do: at the outset of this sequel, we find out that a dormant volcano underneath Isla Nublar – the island from the original Jurassic Park and the sequel Jurassic World – is threatening to explode and kill all life on the island, particularly in and around the now-defunct theme park. Former theme park manager-turned-dinosaur rights activist Claire (Bryce Dallas Howard) is contacted by the estate of Ben Lockwood (James Cromwell), a former collaborator of John Hammond, who has plans to move the dinosaurs off the island and to a sanctuary he has created for them.

And so Claire, with her knowledge of the park, treks out to Isla Nublar with Lockwood’s team, accompanied by a vet, a tech geek and Owen Grady (Chris Pratt), whose connection to the velociraptor Blue will help the team rescue her. But alas, all is not as it seems: Lockwood’s assistant Mills (Rafe Spall) has double-crossed his boss, and is actually bringing the dinosaurs to the mainland to auction them off to the highest bidder, alongside a horrific newly-created predator, the Indo-raptor.

As you’d expect, Claire and Owen don’t feel so good about all of this, and decide to stop Mills’ auction and kill the indo-raptor before it can kill anyone, which it manages to do anyway with something approaching ruthless efficiency. The movie ends with the former inhabitants of Isla Nublar escaping into the wilds of the United States of America, as Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum) tells a senate committee “welcome to Jurassic World”.

It’s very much a sequel in two parts – the first half, in which the characters go back to the island again and are forced to escape with their lives, and the second in which the dinos are brought to the mainland and there is a great deal of talk about the ethics of genetic modification (one minor plotline deals with a new character, Maisie, being a human clone; the ethics of human cloning, it turns out, is what caused the rift between Hammond and Lockwood back before Jurassic Park existed), with the final scenes setting up a sequel that won’t rely on anyone going to an island.

In a way, you could see Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom as the middle-chapter of a new trilogy that seeks to correct some of the problems that Willems was talking about. Yes, characters went back to the island, but the second half of the film clearly seeks to set up a future in which characters don’t have to make decisions we don’t understand – and in that context, you can forgive the island-set first half as merely putting the characters and the dinosaurs in a room together.

It makes for a potentially exciting future for the franchise. A third Jurassic World film could find Owen and Claire helping hunt wild dinos in rural America. Or it could be a Planet Of The Apes-style dystopia in which dinosaurs have replaced humans as the dominate predator. Or it could go further down the genetics route, with genetically-modified dinosaurs being used as weapons both against the original dinos and against humans. The possibilities are endless, and don’t involve islands. And, I’ll be honest, I’ll be queueing up on opening night regardless of what direction the film takes.

As far as this film goes, it was pretty good. I mean, the notion that the sequels are samey is right – if you’ve seen one human-being-hunted-by-a-dangerous-predator, you’ve seen ‘em all. J.A. Bayona directs this film with plenty of style, ramping the tension at the right points, but it isn’t as horrific as you might expect, no more so than any of the earlier films.

Pratt and Howard are fine too. I don’t know that their characters are necessarily strong enough to carry the franchise as much as they have been, but the actors make up for it with genuine charisma and rapport on screen. And it was nice to see Goldblum pop up in a fairly brief cameo, one of several nice little nods to the original film.

I don’t know what to tell you – it is a Jurassic Park sequel, so it’s probably a lot like you’re expecting.

But I am excited by some of the story choices late in the film, and especially the notion of dinosaurs running wild in the real world. Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom may not be the great Jurassic Park sequel we want or deserve, but there is a chance the next film might be. And I’m excited to see what they do next.

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom was directed by J.A. Bayona, from a script by Derek Connolly and Colin Trevorrow, and stars Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Rafe Spall, Justice Smith, Daniella Pineda, Isabella Sermon, James Cromwell, Toby Jones, Ted Levine, BD Wong, and Jeff Goldblum. It is in cinemas now.

The thing Guardians Of The Galaxy: Vol 2 is missing.

I’m currently in the middle of watching the movies of the Marvel Cinematic Universe again, in anticipation of Thor: Ragnarok (which opens next Thursday), and just went past one of my favourites in the entire MCU: the original Guardians Of The Galaxy. And I noticed something about that film which was notable – not just because of what it meant to that film, but also notable because it was missing from the sequel, Guardains Of The Galaxy: Vol 2.

Warning: spoilers from both films follow, so watch them before reading on.

The original film was a success both at the box office and with critics, who described it as weird and wonderful, but with a real heart at the centre of everything – and a lot of that heart comes from small character moments: Rocket angrily letting loose about his past, or Drax defending Gamora from Nebula’s insults (“nobody talks to my friends like that”) or the closing scene with Quill opening the gift from his mother.

And we get similar – albeit not so small and subtle – scenes in the sequel: Quill dealing with the death of his mother in a more direct way, Gamora making amends with her estranged sister, Drax revealing more about his past with Mantis, and so on. The Guardians Of The Galaxy films both attempt to bring an emotive aspect to everything, even if it is a little heavy-handed at times.

But I think one character is horribly underserved in the sequel: Groot.

Okay, I know I’m not covering new ground here. Despite the popularity of Baby Groot, I think a lot of fans were probably disappointed that Groot didn’t get to play as big a role on the team as he did in the first film, here relegated to little side missions – arm the bomb, get the fin – instead of being used as a more active member of the team.

Remember how Quill, Drax and Groot have to fight their way through Ronan’s ship, and Groot got to fight off a number of henchmen through his sheer power? Yeah, he doesn’t get to do anything like that in the sequel.

In fact, I think there are three brilliant, and touching, Groot scenes in the first film which don’t have a match in the second – and it is that, combined with the fact that Vol 2 super-sizes everything on the emotional side of things, which is completely, and very noticeably, missing.

The first scene is shortly after the group arrives on Knowhere: the team disembarks from the Milano, and a small girl approaches Groot out of sheer curiosity – and Groot bends down, innocently smiles at the girl, and produces a flower from the palm of his hand, which he picks off and gently hands to the girl.

The second scene is after the team crash-land on Ronan’s ship, the Dark Aster; emerging from their craft, Drax laments how dark the interior of the ship is. Groot opens his arms wide and reaches upward, producing glowing spores from his body that light the way through the ship for his friends.

The third scene is near the end of the film, when the team realises that the Dark Aster is going to crash into Xandar: while the rest of the group bicker over what to do, Groot calmly scoops them up and creates a ball of intertwining sticks and foliage which will protect them on impact. Rocket laments his actions, saying “Groot, you’ll die!”, but Groot softly but forcefully responds “we are Groot”. Cue tears.

Look, I love Guardians Of The Galaxy: Vol 2. It is the funniest of the MCU movies to date, and features some of the best action scenes – and is a very worthy follow-up to the first film. But it just seems to me that it is missing that element of heart that is so intrinsic to the original.

And these Groot scenes are emblematic of the wider problem. There is no equivalent scenes in the sequel, no small moments that reveal a little of the deeper character traits of Groot, and very few that do this for anyone on the cast. When we meet Groot in Guardians Of The Galaxy, he is introduced to us as an enforcer, as Rocket’s muscle for hire, but as the film goes on we find he is playful, gentle, and has a wonderful heart under all those twigs.

In the sequel, Groot ends the film exactly where he started: as a baby. We don’t learn more about him – or really about anyone outside of Quill, and a little of Drax – as the film goes on. And where Groot’s sacrifice near the end of the original hits hard, the major death in the sequel (Yondu) doesn’t quite land the same way.

Those scenes I mentioned, giving the flower to the little girl or lighting the way for his friends, those scenes are where the heart of Guardians Of The Galaxy is most evident. Despite Vol 2 being a solid, entertaining film, those types of scene are noticeably missing in the sequel.

And in a genre where heart is sorely missing is most entries, it is sad that a franchise (or sub-franchise) that nailed it the first time wasn’t able to hit it again the second. If it had, we might be talking about Vol 2 as one of the best ever.

Guardians Of The Galaxy: Vol 2 is directed by James Gunn, and stars Chris Pratt, Zoe Saldana, Dave Bautista, Michael Rooker, Kurt Russell and Pom Klementieff, with the voices of Vin Diesel and Bradley Cooper, and is available on bluray/DVD now. Thor: Ragnarok is directed by Taika Waititi, and stars Chris Hemsworth, Cate Blanchett, Mark Ruffalo, Tom Hiddleston, Tessa Thompson and Jeff Goldblum, and is in cinemas next Thursday.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén